Historically, what have been wrong views of sanctification and holiness?

Marcus Serven briefly describes in this video two wrong views of sanctification.

First, in the 1980’s, there was a wrong idea that a person could somehow live as a “carnal Christian.” Specifically, by making a profession of faith, an individual's current life did not need to have even a remote connection to that profession of faith. Essentially, they could be "free" to live their life however they wished. This idea leads to antinomianism where there is no law, no sense of Christian discipleship, and no sense of government.

This is a wrong and flawed understanding of holiness. Christ said that there would be the manifestation of fruit when we abide in Christ. Holiness grows in the Christian life. It is not something that remains stagnant throughout their entire life.

Another wrong view that came about in the mid-1800’s is the idea of an instantaneous sanctification. Essentially, if you had a "second experience" or "crisis point," you would be instantaneously "sanctified." All of the manifestations of sin in your life would be gone. However, Scripture is clear that no individual becomes sinless instantly and completely and that sanctification is a progressive process.

John 17:17 (NKJV) – “Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth.”

There are several wrong views of sanctification. Just to put them historically, looking back to the 1980s at the Lordship controversy, what we see at that time was a bringing out of the whole concept that a person could somehow live as a carnal Christian, that they could have made a profession of faith at some point in the past, but that their current life doesn't even remotely connect with that profession. And what's wrong with that view is that Jesus himself said that there would be fruit that begins to make itself manifest as we abide in Christ. When we're connected to Christ that means we stay connected to Christ and that bears fruit in our life. There's a sense in which holiness grows in the Christian life.

So the whole carnal Christianity idea leads to antinomianism, no law, no sense of government, no sense of real Christian discipleship, and that would be a flawed understanding in theology or in Christian practice, that would be one view. Another view that's been out there for quite a long time, going back really to the mid-1800s and the Second Great Awakening, would be the idea of an instantaneous sanctification. That somehow if you just had a particular second experience or you were slain in the spirit or you had some other crisis point in your life, that that would lead to instantaneous sanctification and all of the manifestations of sin in your life would be gone, they would evaporate. And my response to that is, for any man who's telling me that, I'd like to talk to his wife or children to find out if that's true. And the reality is that if you did talk to the wife and children they would point out that no actually there wasn't a complete eradication of sinful impulses, sinful thoughts, words, tendencies and all of that.

The sober truth is that sanctification is progressive.